Fibro-blast Therapy vs Microneedling: Which Procedure Works Better?

Fibro-blast Therapy vs Microneedling: Which Procedure Works Better?

Fibro-blast vs Microneedling: Which Procedure Works Better?

Fibro-blast therapy vs microneedling are two of the most popular skincare procedures used to treat wrinkles and loose, saggy skin. Both of these treatments seek to stimulate the production of collagen, which is the protein responsible for skin elasticity. Furthermore, both Fibro-blast therapy and microneedling are minimally-invasive and require little downtime compared to other rejuvenation treatments.

All that said, we have a big dilemma on our hands. Fibro-blast vs. microneedling: which is better?


What Is Fibro-blast Therapy?

Fibro-blast therapy is a non-invasive procedure that emits a high-frequency electrical current to create a combustible charge near the problem area. The heat from the combustion causes micro-injuries that stimulate the production of new collagen and elastin in the skin. In other words, Fibro-blast treatment creates controlled burns to tighten and rejuvenate the skin.


What Is Microneedling?

Microneedling is a minimally-invasive procedure that involves the use of tiny sterilised needles to prick the skin. For fine lines, the process involves pushing the needles between 0.25 to 1 mm deep into the skin. Deeper scars or wrinkles may require the needle depth to be at 1.5 to 2 mm.

The resulting wounds encourage the body to produce new collagen and elastin, which heals, tightens, and revitalises the skin.


Fibro-blast vs Microneedling, Breaking Down The Differences

Fibroblast treatment and microneedling operate on the same principle: creating small controlled injuries on the skin to stimulate the production of collagen and elastin.

However, apart from the principle behind these anti-aging treatments, there are a lot of differences that must be taken into consideration. The way in which these treatments work is very, very different.

That said, here are the most important differences between microneedling vs fibroblast therapy.


Conditions Treated

Microneedling can help with issues like shallow wrinkles, fine lines, acne and injury scars, and large pores.

Fibro-blast therapy can help with deeper and more complex issues like upper eyelid hooding, crow’s feet, jawline laxity, and benign lesion removal; as well as the simpler issues that microneedling addresses.

That said, Fibro-blast therapy is more effective in treating both shallow issues as well as conditions that involve sagging and less tone in the skin. Fibro-blast therapy boasts incredible skin tightening effects, and can also remove skin tags. It’s my personal favourite approach to treating eye bags and tightening lose skin around the eyes.



With Fibro-blast therapy, you will be able to see noticeable results after the area is fully healed, which can take around 6 to 8 weeks. You can expect results to last for three years or even longer.

For microneedling, results may be noticeable after 3 to 4 weeks and will last for about 3 to 5 months. It is common for microneedling clients to schedule 2 to 3 sessions a year to maintain their results.

Both methods may require more than one treatment to achieve your desired results. But while microneedling may require 3 to 6 sessions, Fibro-Blast therapy usually takes only 1 to 3.


Recovery & Safety

Just like any procedure, there are certain risks to consider.

These procedures create micro-injuries on the skin, which can become infected with improper care. Keep in mind that these tiny injuries are open wounds where bacteria, creams, and soaps can enter. Without proper aftercare, you run the risk of getting an infection or irritating the treated area with chemicals in lotions, soaps, and shampoos.

Swelling, scabbing, and slight discomfort are also common side effects for both procedures but will fade away after a few days. Swelling is a natural part of the healing process and should be allowed to run its course without intervention from ice packs. Scabbing, on the other hand, is also a normal part of the process. These scabs should not be picked to avoid developing scars or hyperpigmentation in the area.

When it comes to recovery, microneedling takes the least time. Healing can take between 1 to 3 days, depending on the extent of the treatment. Fibro-blast therapy takes longer to heal, averaging around six to eight weeks, but the results last way longer than microneedling.


Fibro-blast vs Microneedling - Which Procedure Is Right For Me?

Microneedling is less expensive, requires a shorter procedure time, and heals faster than Fibro-blast therapy. However, it may take more than a few sessions to achieve the result you want, and results usually only last for about 5 months.

In comparison, Fibro-blast therapy may be more expensive and take longer to heal, but the results last for years. Additionally, most clients only need 1 to 2 sessions to achieve their desired results, which means that you will likely spend less for long-lasting results.

Furthermore, Fibro-blast therapy can treat deeper, more complex issues than microneedling can, especially when it comes to sagging skin and deep wrinkles. Using Fibro-blast therapy for a skin tightening effect is one such case of this.


So, when it comes to the Fibro-blast therapy vs microneedling debate, which one wins?

All things considered, Fibro-blast therapy is the better investment if you are aiming for more noticeable and longer-lasting results.


Interested in adding Fibro-blast Therpay to your clinic?…

 Fibro-blast Training:





Back to blog